Alight, Inc. / Delaware vs Bright Horizons Family Solutions
ALIT and BFAM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALIT and BFAM compare
Bright Horizons Family Solutions is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as Alight, Inc. / Delaware ($2.5B against $329M).
Bright Horizons Family Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.7% versus −3.5% for Alight, Inc. / Delaware).
Bright Horizons Family Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.4% compared with −90.9% at Alight, Inc. / Delaware.
Alight, Inc. / Delaware pays a dividend yielding 6.5%; Bright Horizons Family Solutions does not pay one.
Alight, Inc. / Delaware scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Bright Horizons Family Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALIT | BFAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $329M | $2.5B |
| Share price | $12.22 | $51.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −73.1% | −47.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.2% | −58.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 9,500 | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 34.2× |
| P/FCF | 1.3× (better) | 9.8× |
| FCF yield | 75.6% (better) | 10.2% |
| Fair value | $87.08 | $30.34 |
| Margin of safety | 86.0% (better) | −71.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 6.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.7% | 14.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −167% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −185% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 49.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% (better) | 22.8% |
| Operating margin | −95.7% | 0.10% (better) |
| Net margin | −90.9% | −4.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.2% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on equity | −97.9% | −13.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −43.7% | 0.14% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.95 | 1.69 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 9.51 |
| Interest coverage | −22.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.42 (better) | 0.45 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.23 | 1.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.6% | 27.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 14.1% | 27.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.3% | 115% |
| Held by insiders | – | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$98.3K (better) | −$657K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- ALIT stock overview
- ALIT income statement
- ALIT valuation and score
- BFAM stock overview
- BFAM income statement
- BFAM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.