Allegro MicroSystems vs Diodes
ALGM and DIOD side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALGM and DIOD compare
Allegro MicroSystems is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Diodes ($5.7B against $3.7B).
On earnings, Diodes is cheaper: it trades at 43.3× trailing earnings, against 509× for Allegro MicroSystems.
Allegro MicroSystems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.2% versus 17.8% for Diodes).
Diodes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with 1.5% at Allegro MicroSystems.
Diodes scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Allegro MicroSystems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALGM | DIOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.7B | $3.7B |
| Share price | $30.53 | $80.13 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.68% | 47.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.2% | −25.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.70 | 1.58 |
| Employees | 4,250 | 7,989 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 509× | 43.3× (better) |
| P/S | 6.0× | 2.3× (better) |
| P/B | 5.9× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 50.6× | 42.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 64.8× | 25.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.5% | 3.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.98 | $51.28 |
| Margin of safety | −104% | −56.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.2% (better) | 17.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 35.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 35.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.2% (better) | 31.7% |
| Operating margin | 4.9% (better) | 4.8% |
| Net margin | 1.5% | 5.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.3% (better) | 8.7% |
| Return on equity | 1.5% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% | 4.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.09 (better) | −5.63 |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | 27.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.70 (better) | 3.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.70 (better) | 5.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.5% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.2M (better) | −$16.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- ALGM stock overview
- ALGM income statement
- ALGM valuation and score
- DIOD stock overview
- DIOD income statement
- DIOD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.