StockData

Alector vs Regenxbio

ALEC and RGNX side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ALEC and RGNX compare

Regenxbio is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Alector ($504M against $284M).

Alector grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (151% versus 12.0% for Regenxbio).

Alector keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.9% compared with −113% at Regenxbio.

Alector scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Regenxbio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricALECRGNX
Size and price
Market cap$284M$504M
Share price$2.54$7.64
Change, 1 year89.6%−34.1%
Change, 5 years−88.1%−77.2%
Beta (5Y)1.501.78
Employees103371
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)4
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E7.3×–
P/S1.6× (better)2.9×
P/B2.4× (better)7.0×
EV/EBITDA3.7×–
FCF yield−52.9%−49.5% (better)
Fair value$8.10–
Margin of safety68.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)151% (better)12.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−0.05%2.0% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin20.2% (better)−94.1%
Net margin23.9% (better)−113%
FCF margin−86.5% (better)−143%
Return on equity47.5% (better)−138%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA−3.53–
Interest coverage–−3.9×
Current ratio4.10 (better)2.86
Altman Z-score−1.55 (better)−3.83
Piotroski F-score14 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions85.8%64.2%
Held by insiders9.6%7.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.0M$9.6K (better)
Short interest, % of float8.3%16.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.