StockData

a.k.a. Brands vs LightInTheBox

AKA and LITB side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AKA and LITB compare

a.k.a. Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.8% versus −12.1% for LightInTheBox).

LightInTheBox keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.7% compared with −4.8% at a.k.a. Brands.

a.k.a. Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for LightInTheBox), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAKALITB
Size and price
Market cap$90.5M–
Share price$8.23$2.72
Change, 1 year−33.9%3.0%
Change, 5 years−95.0%−72.2%
Beta (5Y)1.590.13
Employees1,6507
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score12 (better)
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.1×–
P/B1.0×–
P/FCF67.4×–
FCF yield1.5%–
Fair value$20.55–
Margin of safety59.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.8% (better)−12.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average22.7% (better)−10.8%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−7.8%
Profitability
Gross margin59.8%65.0% (better)
Operating margin−2.9%3.6% (better)
Net margin−4.8%3.7% (better)
FCF margin0.22%2.8% (better)
Return on equity−29.5%–
Return on invested capital−7.6%–
Financial health
Debt / equity1.13–
Net debt / EBITDA–−2.88
Interest coverage−2.0×469× (better)
Current ratio1.06 (better)0.46
Altman Z-score0.38–
Piotroski F-score48 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions55.6%0.50%
Held by insiders3.9%64.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$0$1.1M (better)
Short interest, % of float0.10%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.