StockData

Xiao-I vs Palladyne AI

AIXI and PDYN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AIXI and PDYN compare

Palladyne AI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (350% versus −82.5% for Xiao-I).

Palladyne AI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −197% compared with −821% at Xiao-I.

Palladyne AI scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 0 for Xiao-I), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIXIPDYN
Size and price
Market cap–$171M
Share price$2.06$3.46
Change, 1 year−98.2%−50.1%
Change, 5 years–−93.1%
Beta (5Y)5.672.78
Employees58161
StockData Score
Total score010 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–8.7×
P/B–2.3×
FCF yield–−22.7%
Fair value–$4.68
Margin of safety–26.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−82.5%350% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.3% (better)−9.9%
Profitability
Gross margin44.4% (better)34.7%
Operating margin−784%−246% (better)
Net margin−821%−197% (better)
FCF margin−30.3% (better)−198%
Return on equity–−60.4%
Return on invested capital–−327%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−213.3×–
Current ratio0.066.27 (better)
Altman Z-score–−3.74
Piotroski F-score13 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−21.3%
Shareholder yield–−21.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%25.4%
Held by insiders0.00%33.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$555K
Short interest, % of float–19.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.