Xiao-I vs MindForge
AIXI and MF side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIXI and MF compare
MindForge grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−49.9% versus −82.5% for Xiao-I).
MindForge keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −223% compared with −821% at Xiao-I.
MindForge scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 0 for Xiao-I), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIXI | MF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.92 | $18.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −98.4% | −67.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 5.62 | 2.98 |
| Employees | 58 | 15 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −82.5% | −49.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.4% (better) | −0.54% |
| Operating margin | −784% | −98.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −821% | −223% (better) |
| FCF margin | −30.3% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −167% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −140% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −213.3× (better) | −20934.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.06 | 1.14 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | – |
Go deeper
- AIXI stock overview
- AIXI income statement
- AIXI valuation and score
- MF stock overview
- MF income statement
- MF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.