Applied Industrial Technologies vs Global Industrial
AIT and GIC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIT and GIC compare
Applied Industrial Technologies is the larger company, worth 6.5 times as much as Global Industrial ($10.8B against $1.7B).
On earnings, Global Industrial is cheaper: it trades at 19.4× trailing earnings, against 26.9× for Applied Industrial Technologies.
Applied Industrial Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus 8.4% for Global Industrial).
Applied Industrial Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.3% compared with 6.1% at Global Industrial.
Both pay dividends: Applied Industrial Technologies yields 0.68% and Global Industrial 2.5%.
Applied Industrial Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Global Industrial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIT | GIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.8B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $294.12 | $43.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.7% | 50.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 185% | 2.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 6,900 | 1,980 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.9× | 19.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 5.8× | 4.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.9× | 12.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.4× | 18.9× (better) |
| PEG | 3.63 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 5.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $208.50 | $40.44 |
| Margin of safety | −41.1% | −7.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | 8.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 6.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 31.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.2% | 31.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.4% (better) | 1.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.3% | 36.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.1% (better) | 8.1% |
| Net margin | 8.3% (better) | 6.1% |
| FCF margin | 9.3% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 22.4% | 26.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 20.8% | 33.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.14 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.25 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.58 (better) | 2.24 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.58 (better) | 7.18 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | 2.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 17.5% | 48.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | −21.8% |
| Buyback yield | 2.9% (better) | −0.11% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 34.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.95% | 63.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.8M | −$1.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- AIT stock overview
- AIT income statement
- AIT valuation and score
- GIC stock overview
- GIC income statement
- GIC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.