Applied Industrial Technologies vs Alta Equipment
AIT and ALTG side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIT and ALTG compare
Applied Industrial Technologies is the larger company, worth 45 times as much as Alta Equipment ($10.8B against $241M).
Applied Industrial Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus −1.8% for Alta Equipment).
Applied Industrial Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.3% compared with −4.4% at Alta Equipment.
Applied Industrial Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.68%; Alta Equipment does not pay one.
Applied Industrial Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 5 for Alta Equipment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIT | ALTG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.8B | $241M |
| Share price | $294.12 | $7.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.7% | 24.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 185% | −55.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 6,900 | 2,750 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.9× | – |
| P/S | 2.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.9× | 4.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.4× | 4.7× (better) |
| PEG | 3.63 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 21.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $208.50 | $22.90 |
| Margin of safety | −41.1% | 67.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | 16.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.3% (better) | 25.9% |
| Operating margin | 11.1% (better) | 0.90% |
| Net margin | 8.3% (better) | −4.4% |
| FCF margin | 9.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| Return on equity | 22.4% (better) | −2086% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.14 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.25 (better) | 3.24 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.58 (better) | 1.38 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.58 (better) | 1.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.68% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 17.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 64.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.95% | 44.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.8M | $468K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- AIT stock overview
- AIT income statement
- AIT valuation and score
- ALTG stock overview
- ALTG income statement
- ALTG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.