StockData

Airsculpt Technologies vs Basel Medical

AIRS and BMGL side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AIRS and BMGL compare

Basel Medical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.2% versus −6.3% for Airsculpt Technologies).

Basel Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.5% compared with −6.4% at Airsculpt Technologies.

Airsculpt Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Basel Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIRSBMGL
Size and price
Market cap$60.3M–
Share price$0.837$0.470
Change, 1 year−86.3%−97.2%
Change, 5 years−94.4%–
Beta (5Y)2.47−0.15
Employees33081
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score01 (better)
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4×–
P/B0.6×–
EV/EBITDA16.5×–
FCF yield−4.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−6.3%45.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin60.2%–
Operating margin−4.7%–
Net margin−6.4%−4.5% (better)
FCF margin−1.7% (better)−5.4%
Return on equity−10.1%–
Return on invested capital−4.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.35–
Net debt / EBITDA4.33–
Interest coverage−1.4×–
Current ratio0.851.23 (better)
Altman Z-score0.70–
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−52.5%–
Shareholder yield−52.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions63.3%–
Held by insiders76.6%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$2.0M–
Short interest, % of float19.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.