StockData

AIRO vs TAT Technologies

AIRO and TATT side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AIRO and TATT compare

TAT Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus 6.9% for AIRO).

TAT Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −23.9% at AIRO.

TAT Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for AIRO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIROTATT
Size and price
Market cap$172M–
Share price$5.46$39.28
Change, 1 year−60.4%−1.8%
Change, 5 years–498%
Beta (5Y)1.840.75
Employees2233,500
StockData Score
Total score311 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.6×–
P/B0.2×–
FCF yield−33.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.9%12.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–18.8%
Net income growth (TTM)–53.6%
EPS growth (TTM)–31.4%
Profitability
Gross margin58.6% (better)25.0%
Operating margin−20.2%10.1% (better)
Net margin−23.9%11.3% (better)
FCF margin−53.4%3.8% (better)
Return on equity−3.6%11.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−2.5%11.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.06
Net debt / EBITDA–−1.80
Interest coverage–27.6×
Current ratio2.874.83 (better)
Altman Z-score2.52–
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions36.0%58.4%
Held by insiders26.0%39.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$940K−$478K (better)
Short interest, % of float13.7%14.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.