StockData

Arteris vs Ambiq Micro

AIP and AMBQ side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AIP and AMBQ compare

Ambiq Micro is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Arteris ($1.1B against $951M).

Ambiq Micro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (63.4% versus 41.0% for Arteris).

Ambiq Micro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −29.7% compared with −44.8% at Arteris.

Ambiq Micro scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Arteris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIPAMBQ
Size and price
Market cap$951M$1.1B
Share price$19.34$47.46
Change, 1 year28.8%69.2%
Change, 5 years−19.8%–
Beta (5Y)1.842.95
Employees299202
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score46 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S10.2×9.7× (better)
P/B14.4×2.8× (better)
P/FCF438×–
FCF yield0.23%–
Fair value$8.79$37.67
Margin of safety−120%−26.0% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)41.0%63.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin86.9% (better)44.8%
Operating margin−46.2%−36.0% (better)
Net margin−44.8%−29.7% (better)
FCF margin2.3%–
Return on equity−153%−12.2% (better)
Return on invested capital–−103%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage−207.7×–
Current ratio1.3516.55 (better)
Altman Z-score2.2323.14 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−30.3%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−30.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions65.2%115%
Held by insiders40.0%13.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$122M−$38.9M (better)
Short interest, % of float8.1%12.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.