Powerfleet vs Turtle Beach
AIOT and TBCH side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIOT and TBCH compare
Powerfleet and Turtle Beach are about the same size, with market caps of $326M and $292M.
Turtle Beach keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.17% compared with −4.7% at Powerfleet.
Turtle Beach scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Powerfleet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIOT | TBCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $326M | $292M |
| Share price | $2.43 | $16.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −52.3% | 6.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −62.4% | −39.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.66 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 2,658 | 290 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0× (better) | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | 99.6× | 7.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.0% | 14.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $6.81 | $8.20 |
| Margin of safety | 64.3% (better) | −98.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | −13.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 40.2% (better) | −2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −103% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −108% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −20.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.1% (better) | 36.5% |
| Operating margin | 4.2% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net margin | −4.7% | −0.17% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.72% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −4.5% | −0.53% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.0% | 4.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.62 (better) | 0.93 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.52 (better) | 5.20 |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.02 | 1.94 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.60 | 2.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 10.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 10.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.7% | 73.9% |
| Held by insiders | 11.7% | 17.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$4.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 24.5% |
Go deeper
- AIOT stock overview
- AIOT income statement
- AIOT valuation and score
- TBCH stock overview
- TBCH income statement
- TBCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.