AIFU vs Yuanbao
AIFU and YB side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIFU and YB compare
Yuanbao grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.1% versus −58.2% for AIFU).
Yuanbao keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with −409% at AIFU.
Yuanbao scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for AIFU), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIFU | YB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $9.50 | $11.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −88.1% | −46.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 594 | 613 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −58.2% | 33.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −29.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −600% | 51.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 43.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 96.2% |
| Operating margin | −7.0% | – |
| Net margin | −409% | 29.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.5% | 33.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −127% | 153% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.96 | 3.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | 1.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 70.8% |
Go deeper
- AIFU stock overview
- AIFU income statement
- AIFU valuation and score
- YB stock overview
- YB income statement
- YB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.