StockData

AIFU vs TWFG

AIFU and TWFG side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AIFU and TWFG compare

TWFG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.0% versus −58.2% for AIFU).

TWFG scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for AIFU), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIFUTWFG
Size and price
Market cap–$1.4B
Share price$9.50$25.79
Change, 1 year−88.1%−2.9%
Change, 5 years−99.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.900.24
Employees594400
StockData Score
Total score27 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score00
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–44.5×
P/S–4.5×
P/B–29.4×
EV/EBITDA–19.2×
P/FCF–25.2×
FCF yield–4.0%
Fair value–$11.01
Margin of safety–−134%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−58.2%35.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−29.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)−600%–
EPS growth (TTM)–34.9%
Profitability
Operating margin−7.0%17.3% (better)
Net margin−409%–
FCF margin−3.5%17.8% (better)
Return on equity−127%–
Return on invested capital−2.1%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.050.05 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.94
Interest coverage–207×
Current ratio2.96 (better)2.81
Altman Z-score–14.33
Piotroski F-score2–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%16.9%
Held by insiders–69.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$3.4M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–6.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.