StockData

AI Financial vs Antalpha Platform

AIFC and ANTA side by side, both in commodity contracts brokers and dealers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AIFC and ANTA compare

Antalpha Platform grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.9% versus −4.2% for AI Financial).

Antalpha Platform keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.7% compared with −4153% at AI Financial.

AI Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Antalpha Platform), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAIFCANTA
Size and price
Market cap$24.2M–
Share price$0.173$2.00
Change, 1 year−91.7%−82.7%
Change, 5 years−96.7%–
Beta (5Y)0.832.15
Employees16113
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score01 (better)
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.2×–
P/B0.0×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.2%67.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−6.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)–456%
EPS growth (TTM)–226%
Profitability
Gross margin53.6%–
Operating margin−112%18.8% (better)
Net margin−4153%30.7% (better)
FCF margin–−5.3%
Return on equity−240%29.4% (better)
Return on invested capital−5.0%2.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04 (better)3.59
Net debt / EBITDA–26.30
Current ratio0.601.16 (better)
Altman Z-score−1.54–
Piotroski F-score25 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions37.5%0.18%
Held by insiders1.5%84.2%
Short interest, % of float8.2%0.28%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.