C3.ai vs Kaltura
AI and KLTR side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AI and KLTR compare
C3.ai is the larger company, worth 9.1 times as much as Kaltura ($1.9B against $209M).
Kaltura grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.9% versus −37.5% for C3.ai).
Kaltura keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.2% compared with −192% at C3.ai.
C3.ai scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Kaltura), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AI | KLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $209M |
| Share price | $11.82 | $1.37 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.3% | −21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −70.4% | −75.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.36 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 764 | 494 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 8.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 48.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 53.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 22.0× |
| FCF yield | −8.2% | 4.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.24 | $0.392 |
| Margin of safety | −15.5% (better) | −250% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −37.5% | 1.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% | 8.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.1% | 72.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −203% | −0.97% (better) |
| Net margin | −192% | −6.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −67.0% | 5.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −59.8% (better) | −103% |
| Return on invested capital | −570% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 5.83 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.45 |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.9× |
| Current ratio | 6.16 (better) | 0.57 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.60 (better) | −2.65 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 7.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.4% | 28.4% |
| Held by insiders | 19.2% | 16.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.0M | −$1.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 32.4% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- AI stock overview
- AI income statement
- AI valuation and score
- KLTR stock overview
- KLTR income statement
- KLTR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.