C3.ai vs Cerence
AI and CRNC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AI and CRNC compare
C3.ai is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Cerence ($1.9B against $358M).
Cerence grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.8% versus −37.5% for C3.ai).
Cerence keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.0% compared with −192% at C3.ai.
Cerence scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for C3.ai), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AI | CRNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $358M |
| Share price | $11.82 | $7.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.3% | −13.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −70.4% | −92.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.36 | 2.00 |
| Employees | 764 | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 8.2× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.7× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 4.6× |
| FCF yield | −8.2% | 22.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.24 | $8.15 |
| Margin of safety | −15.5% | 2.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −37.5% | 25.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% (better) | −5.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.1% | 78.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −203% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −192% | −5.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −67.0% | 25.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −59.8% | −9.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −570% | 3.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.71 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.3× |
| Current ratio | 6.16 (better) | 2.08 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.60 (better) | −0.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −0.28% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.28% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.4% | 82.9% |
| Held by insiders | 19.2% | 8.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.0M | −$3.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 32.4% | 12.2% |
Go deeper
- AI stock overview
- AI income statement
- AI valuation and score
- CRNC stock overview
- CRNC income statement
- CRNC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.