Ashford Hospitality Trust vs Chatham Lodging Trust
AHT and CLDT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AHT and CLDT compare
Chatham Lodging Trust is the larger company, worth 49 times as much as Ashford Hospitality Trust ($757M against $15.5M).
Chatham Lodging Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.8% versus −9.5% for Ashford Hospitality Trust).
Chatham Lodging Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.0% compared with 0.97% at Ashford Hospitality Trust.
Chatham Lodging Trust pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Ashford Hospitality Trust does not pay one.
Chatham Lodging Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Ashford Hospitality Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AHT | CLDT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.5M | $757M |
| Share price | $2.39 | $16.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.5% | 137% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.1% | 29.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.52 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 82 | 16 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 102× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | −0.1× | 7.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.96 |
| Fair value | – | $12.09 |
| Margin of safety | – | −34.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.5% | 3.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% (better) | 15.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 80.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 1500% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 27.2% (better) | 13.4% |
| Net margin | 0.97% | 5.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 2.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 1.2× | 1.6× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −1.05 | 0.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | 63.0% | 121% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.27% | 2.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% | 4.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.9% | 95.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 2.9% |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- AHT stock overview
- AHT income statement
- AHT valuation and score
- CLDT stock overview
- CLDT income statement
- CLDT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.