Ashford Hospitality Trust vs Braemar Hotels & Resorts
AHT and BHR.PD side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AHT and BHR.PD compare
Braemar Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 74 times as much as Ashford Hospitality Trust ($1.1B against $15.3M).
Ashford Hospitality Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.8% versus −9.1% for Braemar Hotels & Resorts).
Ashford Hospitality Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.1% compared with −37.4% at Braemar Hotels & Resorts.
Braemar Hotels & Resorts pays a dividend yielding 12.6%; Ashford Hospitality Trust does not pay one.
Braemar Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Ashford Hospitality Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AHT | BHR.PD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.3M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $2.37 | $16.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −48.0% | −21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.2% | −37.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.52 | 0.28 |
| Employees | 82 | 82 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | −0.1× | – |
| Fair value | – | $18.91 |
| Margin of safety | – | 13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.8% (better) | −9.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | 25.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.7% (better) | 30.3% |
| Operating margin | 20.2% (better) | −28.7% |
| Net margin | −6.1% (better) | −37.4% |
| Return on equity | – | −455% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 0.9× (better) | −2.3× |
| Altman Z-score | −1.02 | −0.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 12.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 0.27% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% | 12.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.9% | 48.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 42.5% |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | – |
Go deeper
- AHT stock overview
- AHT income statement
- AHT valuation and score
- BHR.PD stock overview
- BHR.PD income statement
- BHR.PD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.