Ashford Hospitality Trust vs Apple Hospitality REIT
AHT and APLE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AHT and APLE compare
Apple Hospitality REIT is the larger company, worth 263 times as much as Ashford Hospitality Trust ($4.4B against $16.6M).
Apple Hospitality REIT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.2% versus −5.8% for Ashford Hospitality Trust).
Apple Hospitality REIT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.2% compared with −6.1% at Ashford Hospitality Trust.
Apple Hospitality REIT pays a dividend yielding 5.2%; Ashford Hospitality Trust does not pay one.
Apple Hospitality REIT scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Ashford Hospitality Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AHT | APLE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.6M | $4.4B |
| Share price | $2.57 | $18.52 |
| Change, 1 year | −46.8% | 61.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.4% | 11.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.51 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 82 | 64 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.0× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | −0.1× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 15.1× |
| PEG | – | 4.54 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.6% |
| Fair value | – | $16.97 |
| Margin of safety | – | −9.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.8% | 1.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | 18.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −3.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −1.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.7% | 40.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 20.2% (better) | 17.9% |
| Net margin | −6.1% | 12.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 20.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 5.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 0.9× | – |
| Altman Z-score | −1.02 | 1.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 129% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 27.5% |
| Buyback yield | 0.25% | 0.35% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.25% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.9% | 86.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 7.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $165K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- AHT stock overview
- AHT income statement
- AHT valuation and score
- APLE stock overview
- APLE income statement
- APLE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.