Aspen Insurance vs Pelagos Insurance Capital
AHL.PD and PLGO side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AHL.PD and PLGO compare
Aspen Insurance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.2% versus −3.6% for Pelagos Insurance Capital).
Aspen Insurance scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Pelagos Insurance Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AHL.PD | PLGO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $16.81 | $28.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.2% | 50.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −37.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 1,169 | 108 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.2% (better) | −3.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −30.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −33.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 10.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 25.1% |
| Return on equity | 9.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −16.55 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 69.0% |
| Held by insiders | – | 16.4% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- AHL.PD stock overview
- AHL.PD income statement
- AHL.PD valuation and score
- PLGO stock overview
- PLGO income statement
- PLGO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.