AGM vs Mega Matrix
AGMH and MPU side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGMH and MPU compare
AGM grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.6% versus −27.9% for Mega Matrix).
AGM keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −131% at Mega Matrix.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGMH | MPU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.446 | $1.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −86.5% | −93.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.9% | −99.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.51 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 11 | 146 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.6% (better) | −27.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 256% (better) | 10.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −82.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% | 55.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −15.3% (better) | −111% |
| Net margin | 1.8% (better) | −131% |
| FCF margin | −13.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 1.8% (better) | −283% |
| Return on invested capital | −7.9% (better) | −256% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 13.27 (better) | 1.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.6% | 0.14% |
| Held by insiders | – | 13.1% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.09% |
Go deeper
- AGMH stock overview
- AGMH income statement
- AGMH valuation and score
- MPU stock overview
- MPU income statement
- MPU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.