AGM vs mF International
AGMH and MFI side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGMH and MFI compare
mF International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.7% versus −4.6% for AGM).
mF International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 233% compared with 1.8% at AGM.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGMH | MFI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.446 | $7.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −86.5% | −69.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.9% | −89.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.51 | 3.00 |
| Employees | 11 | 10 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.6% | 29.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 256% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −82.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% | 29.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −15.3% (better) | −144% |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 233% (better) |
| FCF margin | −13.3% (better) | −47.4% |
| Return on equity | 1.8% | 8.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.9% | −6.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Current ratio | 13.27 | 254.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.6% | – |
| Held by insiders | – | 18.4% |
Go deeper
- AGMH stock overview
- AGMH income statement
- AGMH valuation and score
- MFI stock overview
- MFI income statement
- MFI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.