StockData

AGM vs 3 E Network Technology

AGMH and MASK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AGMH and MASK compare

3 E Network Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus −4.6% for AGM).

AGM keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −2.7% at 3 E Network Technology.

AGM scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for 3 E Network Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAGMHMASK
Size and price
Share price$0.446$1.80
Change, 1 year−86.5%−86.3%
Change, 5 years−99.9%–
Beta (5Y)1.51−1.46
Employees1117
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.6%48.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average256%–
Net income growth (TTM)−82.0% (better)−126%
EPS growth (TTM)−95.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.3%47.0% (better)
Operating margin−15.3%3.6% (better)
Net margin1.8% (better)−2.7%
FCF margin−13.3% (better)−43.8%
Return on equity1.8% (better)−2.1%
Return on invested capital−7.9%1.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–1.1×
Current ratio13.27 (better)4.23
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions7.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.