StockData

AGM vs Australian Oilseeds

AGMH and COOT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

agmhAGM$0.45−86.5% in 1 yearcootAustralian Oilseeds$0.28−78.3% in 1 year

How AGMH and COOT compare

Australian Oilseeds grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.6% versus −4.6% for AGM).

AGM keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −3.1% at Australian Oilseeds.

AGM scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 1 for Australian Oilseeds), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAGMHCOOT
Size and price
Share price$0.446$0.284
Change, 1 year−86.5%−78.3%
Change, 5 years−99.9%−97.2%
Beta (5Y)1.510.12
Employees1145
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)1
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.6%23.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average256%–
Net income growth (TTM)−82.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)−95.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.3% (better)8.3%
Operating margin−15.3%−0.00% (better)
Net margin1.8% (better)−3.1%
FCF margin−13.3%−0.99% (better)
Return on equity1.8% (better)−266%
Return on invested capital−7.9%−0.00% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.003.83 (better)
Interest coverage–−0.0×
Current ratio13.27 (better)0.59
Piotroski F-score44
Ownership
Held by institutions7.6%–
Held by insiders–66.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.