Abundia Global Impact vs Mexco Energy
AGIG and MXC side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGIG and MXC compare
Abundia Global Impact is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Mexco Energy ($35.8M against $20.3M).
Abundia Global Impact grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (101% versus −8.1% for Mexco Energy).
Mexco Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.9% compared with −386% at Abundia Global Impact.
Mexco Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Abundia Global Impact does not pay one.
Mexco Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 2 for Abundia Global Impact), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGIG | MXC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.8M | $20.3M |
| Share price | $0.810 | $9.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −84.9% | 4.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −95.2% | −8.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.35 | 0.28 |
| Employees | 2 | 4 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.7× |
| P/S | 7.8× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.1× |
| FCF yield | −55.0% | – |
| Fair value | – | $11.61 |
| Margin of safety | – | 14.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 101% (better) | −8.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −5.8% | 18.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −23.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −22.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 51.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −356% | 19.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −386% | 19.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −428% | – |
| Return on equity | −109% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −49.8% | 5.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −72.5× | 290× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.35 | 4.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.17 | 7.32 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 15.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.9% | 8.9% |
| Held by insiders | 73.0% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $276K (better) | −$70.4K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 0.21% |
Go deeper
- AGIG stock overview
- AGIG income statement
- AGIG valuation and score
- MXC stock overview
- MXC income statement
- MXC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.