StockData

Abundia Global Impact vs EON Resources

AGIG and EONR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AGIG and EONR compare

Abundia Global Impact is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as EON Resources ($35.8M against $14.3M).

Abundia Global Impact grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (101% versus −24.6% for EON Resources).

EON Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −74.1% compared with −386% at Abundia Global Impact.

EON Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Abundia Global Impact), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAGIGEONR
Size and price
Market cap$35.8M$14.3M
Share price$0.810$0.256
Change, 1 year−84.9%−46.0%
Change, 5 years−95.2%–
Beta (5Y)−0.35−0.39
Employees26
StockData Score
Total score23 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score00
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S7.8×0.9× (better)
FCF yield−55.0%–
Fair value–$0.411
Margin of safety–37.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)101% (better)−24.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−5.8%–
Profitability
Operating margin−356%−116% (better)
Net margin−386%−74.1% (better)
FCF margin−428%–
Return on equity−109%−65.0% (better)
Return on invested capital−49.8%−24.5% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage−72.5×−9.3× (better)
Current ratio0.35 (better)0.16
Altman Z-score−2.17−1.20 (better)
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−10.3%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−10.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions5.9%9.7%
Held by insiders73.0%11.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$276K (better)$0
Short interest, % of float2.9%5.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.