Alamos Gold vs Iamgold
AGI and IAG side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGI and IAG compare
Iamgold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (74.7% versus 34.3% for Alamos Gold).
Iamgold scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Alamos Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $27.45 | $15.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 34.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 246% | 410% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 1.39 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.3% | 74.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.3% (better) | 18.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 204% (better) | −24.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 41.5% | 66.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% (better) | 42.3% |
| Operating margin | 60.7% (better) | 38.3% |
| FCF margin | 15.9% | 29.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 19.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.16 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.39 | 0.21 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 9.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.00 (better) | 1.75 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.1% | 64.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 3.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- AGI stock overview
- AGI income statement
- AGI valuation and score
- IAG stock overview
- IAG income statement
- IAG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.