Alamos Gold vs Fortuna Mining
AGI and FSM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGI and FSM compare
Fortuna Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.8% versus 34.3% for Alamos Gold).
Fortuna Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Alamos Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGI | FSM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $27.45 | $8.88 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 10.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 246% | 74.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 1.10 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.3% | 39.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.3% | 27.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 123% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 204% (better) | 120% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 41.5% | 49.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% (better) | 49.3% |
| Operating margin | 60.7% (better) | 43.1% |
| Net margin | – | 30.4% |
| FCF margin | 15.9% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 18.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.39 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.00 | 2.98 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.1% | 63.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- AGI stock overview
- AGI income statement
- AGI valuation and score
- FSM stock overview
- FSM income statement
- FSM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.