Alamos Gold vs Franco Nevada
AGI and FNV side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGI and FNV compare
Franco Nevada grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (63.7% versus 34.3% for Alamos Gold).
Franco Nevada scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Alamos Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGI | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $27.45 | $224.95 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 20.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 246% | 57.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.51 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.3% | 63.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.3% (better) | 12.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 204% (better) | 101% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 41.5% (better) | 27.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% | 73.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 60.7% | 74.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.9% | 81.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.39 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 437× |
| Current ratio | 2.00 | 9.38 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.1% | 74.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- AGI stock overview
- AGI income statement
- AGI valuation and score
- FNV stock overview
- FNV income statement
- FNV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.