Alamos Gold vs Eldorado Gold
AGI and EGO side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGI and EGO compare
Eldorado Gold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.5% versus 34.3% for Alamos Gold).
Eldorado Gold scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Alamos Gold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGI | EGO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $27.45 | $32.38 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 29.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 246% | 235% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.3% | 37.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.3% (better) | 12.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 75.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 204% (better) | 75.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 41.5% (better) | 28.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% (better) | 48.5% |
| Operating margin | 60.7% (better) | 40.0% |
| Net margin | – | 27.9% |
| FCF margin | 15.9% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 12.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.30 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.39 | 0.41 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 23.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.00 (better) | 1.83 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.1% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- AGI stock overview
- AGI income statement
- AGI valuation and score
- EGO stock overview
- EGO income statement
- EGO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.