First Majestic Silver vs Iamgold
AG and IAG side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AG and IAG compare
First Majestic Silver grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (124% versus 74.7% for Iamgold).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AG | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $14.26 | $15.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.8% | 34.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.3% | 410% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.25 | 1.39 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 124% (better) | 74.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.1% (better) | 18.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −24.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.3% | 66.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.8% (better) | 42.3% |
| Operating margin | 31.6% | 38.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 36.9% (better) | 29.8% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 11.7% | 19.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.11 (better) | 0.16 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.76 | 0.21 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 15.1× (better) | 9.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.60 (better) | 1.75 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 6.0% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 45.9% | 64.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 3.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- AG stock overview
- AG income statement
- AG valuation and score
- IAG stock overview
- IAG income statement
- IAG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.