StockData

AudioEye vs Datasea Intelligent Technology

AEYE and DTSS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AEYE and DTSS compare

AudioEye grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −43.2% for Datasea Intelligent Technology).

Datasea Intelligent Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.4% compared with −7.1% at AudioEye.

Datasea Intelligent Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for AudioEye), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAEYEDTSS
Size and price
Market cap$181M–
Share price$14.30$0.566
Change, 1 year15.6%−66.9%
Change, 5 years84.5%−97.8%
Beta (5Y)1.900.74
Employees11642
StockData Score
Total score67 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score11
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S4.2×–
P/B35.7×–
EV/EBITDA102×–
P/FCF27.9×–
FCF yield3.6%–
Fair value$2.21–
Margin of safety−548%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.1% (better)−43.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.5%197% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin79.8% (better)10.2%
Operating margin−4.8% (better)−5.7%
Net margin−7.1%−5.4% (better)
FCF margin15.2% (better)4.9%
Return on equity−56.7%−42.8% (better)
Return on invested capital−12.4% (better)−39.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.20 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA3.74–
Current ratio1.23 (better)0.44
Altman Z-score0.57–
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.81%–
Shareholder yield0.81%–
Ownership
Held by institutions33.6%0.98%
Held by insiders34.2%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.2M–
Short interest, % of float4.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.