Aetherion Technologies vs A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions
AETR and AZ side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AETR and AZ compare
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (153% versus −73.4% for Aetherion Technologies).
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −236% compared with −493% at Aetherion Technologies.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AETR | AZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.89 | $6.13 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.2% | −15.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.8% | −68.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 1.12 |
| Employees | – | 122 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −73.4% | 153% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −37.9% | 49.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.2% | 20.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −277% | −268% (better) |
| Net margin | −493% | −236% (better) |
| FCF margin | −114% (better) | −248% |
| Return on equity | −52.0% (better) | −69.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −27.1% (better) | −108% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.03 |
| Interest coverage | −56.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.14 | 7.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 21.0% | 44.4% |
| Held by insiders | 10.5% | 2.5% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 10.9% |
Go deeper
- AETR stock overview
- AETR income statement
- AETR valuation and score
- AZ stock overview
- AZ income statement
- AZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.