Atlas Energy Solutions vs Hess Midstream LP
AESI and HESM side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AESI and HESM compare
Hess Midstream LP is the larger company, worth 5.7 times as much as Atlas Energy Solutions ($4.0B against $698M).
Hess Midstream LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.60% versus −8.1% for Atlas Energy Solutions).
Hess Midstream LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.5% compared with −11.1% at Atlas Energy Solutions.
Hess Midstream LP pays a dividend yielding 7.5%; Atlas Energy Solutions does not pay one.
Hess Midstream LP scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Atlas Energy Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AESI | HESM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $698M | $4.0B |
| Share price | $5.58 | $30.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −47.6% | −8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 29.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.57 |
| Employees | 1,511 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 0.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.5× | 7.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 4.4× |
| FCF yield | −26.4% | 22.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.71 | $29.67 |
| Margin of safety | 52.3% (better) | −4.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.1% | −0.60% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 8.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −946% | 14.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −779% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −8.3% | 62.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −11.1% | 23.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −17.2% | 56.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −9.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −3.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 11.33 | 3.58 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.82 (better) | 0.25 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.63 | 1.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 9.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.7% | 89.3% |
| Held by insiders | 58.2% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 44.3% | – |
Go deeper
- AESI stock overview
- AESI income statement
- AESI valuation and score
- HESM stock overview
- HESM income statement
- HESM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.