Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. vs Azul
AERO and AZUL side by side, both in air transportation, scheduled, and air courier. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AERO and AZUL compare
Azul grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus −4.6% for Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V.).
Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. scores higher on the StockData Score (2 against 1 for Azul), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AERO | AZUL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $16.55 | $4.50 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.5% | 82.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 429% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.58 | – |
| Employees | 17K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.6% | 10.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 30.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −43.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −46.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 17.3% | 20.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 10.8% (better) | −6.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.00 | 3.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× (better) | 0.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.64 (better) | 0.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.5% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 24.0% | 8.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$692K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
Go deeper
- AERO stock overview
- AERO income statement
- AERO valuation and score
- AZUL stock overview
- AZUL income statement
- AZUL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.