American Electric Power vs AES
AEP and AES side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEP and AES compare
American Electric Power is the larger company, worth 6.7 times as much as AES ($70.9B against $10.6B).
On earnings, AES is cheaper: it trades at 11.8× trailing earnings, against 22.5× for American Electric Power.
American Electric Power grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus −0.37% for AES).
Both pay dividends: American Electric Power yields 2.9% and AES 4.7%.
AES scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for American Electric Power), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEP | AES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $70.9B | $10.6B |
| Share price | $130.21 | $14.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.6% | 3.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 53.1% | −40.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 18K | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.7× (better) | 542× |
| P/FCF | 16.5× | – |
| PEG | 1.60 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.0% (better) | −15.3% |
| Fair value | $105.39 | $19.39 |
| Margin of safety | −23.5% | 23.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.3% (better) | −0.37% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% (better) | 4.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −45.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −15.2% (better) | −46.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.5% | 78.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.7% (better) | 18.1% |
| Operating margin | 23.0% | – |
| Net margin | – | 7.4% |
| FCF margin | 18.8% (better) | −13.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 21.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.65 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 9.96 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 0.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.93 (better) | 0.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 4.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 55.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 14 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.7% (better) | 3.9% |
| Buyback yield | −1.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 4.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.2% | 89.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.10% | 0.57% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.4% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- AEP stock overview
- AEP income statement
- AEP valuation and score
- AES stock overview
- AES income statement
- AES valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.