Agnico Eagle Mines vs Pan American Silver
AEM and PAAS side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEM and PAAS compare
Agnico Eagle Mines grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.7% versus 28.4% for Pan American Silver).
Pan American Silver scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Agnico Eagle Mines), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEM | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $165.38 | $37.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.5% | 8.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 209% | 46.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 5,723 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.7% (better) | 28.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.6% (better) | 22.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 134% | 726% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.4% (better) | 24.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 71.9% (better) | 38.8% |
| Operating margin | – | 34.1% |
| FCF margin | 36.9% (better) | 28.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 17.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.32 | −0.29 |
| Interest coverage | – | 411× |
| Current ratio | 2.02 | 2.69 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.8% | 51.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Go deeper
- AEM stock overview
- AEM income statement
- AEM valuation and score
- PAAS stock overview
- PAAS income statement
- PAAS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.