StockData

Agnico Eagle Mines vs Gold Fields

AEM and GFI side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AEM and GFI compare

Gold Fields grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (68.2% versus 43.7% for Agnico Eagle Mines).

Gold Fields scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Agnico Eagle Mines), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAEMGFI
Size and price
Share price$165.38$32.92
Change, 1 year5.5%−13.9%
Change, 5 years209%253%
Beta (5Y)0.670.87
Employees5,72323K
StockData Score
Total score513 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score35 (better)
Performance score05 (better)
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)43.7%68.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average30.6% (better)17.6%
Net income growth (TTM)–187%
EPS growth (TTM)134%186% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average33.4%37.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin71.9% (better)57.9%
Net margin–40.8%
FCF margin36.9% (better)27.1%
Return on equity–52.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.32
Net debt / EBITDA−0.320.15 (better)
Current ratio2.02–
Piotroski F-score–6
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–19.8%
Years of dividend growth–1
Dividend growth, 5Y average–37.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions63.8%18.4%
Held by insiders0.00%0.01%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$35.5K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.