Ameren vs Public Service Enterprise
AEE and PEG side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEE and PEG compare
Public Service Enterprise is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Ameren ($37.0B against $31.4B).
On earnings, Public Service Enterprise is cheaper: it trades at 18.5× trailing earnings, against 19.9× for Ameren.
Public Service Enterprise grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.7% versus 3.8% for Ameren).
Both pay dividends: Ameren yields 2.6% and Public Service Enterprise 3.6%.
Public Service Enterprise scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Ameren), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEE | PEG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $31.4B | $37.0B |
| Share price | $113.28 | $74.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.6% | −10.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 32.7% | 17.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 0.48 |
| Employees | – | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× | 18.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.6× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.9× (better) | 21.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 134× |
| PEG | 2.24 | 0.68 (better) |
| FCF yield | −4.5% | 0.75% (better) |
| Fair value | $104.50 | $68.17 |
| Margin of safety | −8.4% (better) | −9.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.8% | 12.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.7% (better) | 4.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.8% (better) | 1.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 2.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 64.0% |
| Operating margin | 24.9% (better) | 23.1% |
| Net margin | – | 16.0% |
| FCF margin | −16.0% | 2.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.59 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.68 (better) | 8.39 |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | 2.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.53 | 0.88 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.91 | 1.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% | 3.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 64.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | 5.2% |
| Buyback yield | −1.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.79% | 3.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.5% | 77.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.36% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.1M | −$2.7M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- AEE stock overview
- AEE income statement
- AEE valuation and score
- PEG stock overview
- PEG income statement
- PEG valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AEE vs CMS
- AEE vs EVRG
- AEE vs LNT
- AEE vs NI
- AEE vs WEC
- DUK vs PEG
- ED vs PEG
- NI vs PEG
- PCG vs PEG
- PEG vs SRE
- PEG vs XEL
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.