Aebi Schmidt vs Astec Industries
AEBI and ASTE side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEBI and ASTE compare
Aebi Schmidt and Astec Industries are about the same size, with market caps of $804M and $889M.
On earnings, Aebi Schmidt is cheaper: it trades at 25.9× trailing earnings, against 77.3× for Astec Industries.
Aebi Schmidt grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (52.2% versus 13.8% for Astec Industries).
Aebi Schmidt keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.6% compared with 0.74% at Astec Industries.
Both pay dividends: Aebi Schmidt yields 1.2% and Astec Industries 1.0%.
Aebi Schmidt scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Astec Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEBI | ASTE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $804M | $889M |
| Share price | $10.36 | $38.63 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.4% | −13.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −44.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 5,700 | 4,468 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.9× (better) | 77.3× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.7× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/FCF | 40.4× | 16.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | 6.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.36 | $33.44 |
| Margin of safety | 22.5% (better) | −15.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 52.2% (better) | 13.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 195% (better) | −75.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 66.7% (better) | −76.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −3.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.2% | 25.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 1.6% (better) | 0.74% |
| FCF margin | 1.0% | 3.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% (better) | 2.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.70 | 0.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.34 | 2.98 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.08 | 2.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.89 | 2.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% (better) | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | 25.1% | 103% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 1.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 98.1% |
| Held by insiders | 66.6% | 6.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $349K (better) | −$59.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- AEBI stock overview
- AEBI income statement
- AEBI valuation and score
- ASTE stock overview
- ASTE income statement
- ASTE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.