Adtran vs ESCO Technologies
ADTN and ESE side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADTN and ESE compare
ESCO Technologies is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as Adtran ($6.0B against $394M).
ESCO Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.0% versus 10.1% for Adtran).
ESCO Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.4% compared with −2.2% at Adtran.
ESCO Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.14%; Adtran does not pay one.
ESCO Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 4 for Adtran), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADTN | ESE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $394M | $6.0B |
| Share price | $4.83 | $231.50 |
| Change, 1 year | −39.9% | 5.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.5% | 146% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 3,338 | 3,425 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.1× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 4.6× |
| P/B | – | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.5× (better) | 28.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.35 |
| FCF yield | 5.7% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | – | $292.64 |
| Margin of safety | – | 20.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.1% | 27.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.4% (better) | 8.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 174% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 173% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 24.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.5% | 42.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.00% | – |
| Net margin | −2.2% | 24.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 16.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 21.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.05 |
| Interest coverage | 0.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.89 (better) | 1.38 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.73 | 5.97 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.14% |
| Payout ratio | – | 2.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.14% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 2.9% | 39.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.3% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- ADTN stock overview
- ADTN income statement
- ADTN valuation and score
- ESE stock overview
- ESE income statement
- ESE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.