Adtran vs Ciena
ADTN and CIEN side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADTN and CIEN compare
Ciena is the larger company, worth 85 times as much as Adtran ($45.5B against $532M).
Ciena grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.6% versus 15.7% for Adtran).
Ciena keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.9% compared with −2.3% at Adtran.
Ciena scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Adtran), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADTN | CIEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $532M | $45.5B |
| Share price | $6.53 | $320.72 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.7% | 69.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −68.4% | 430% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 3,338 | 9,080 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 71.6× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 7.6× |
| P/B | – | 14.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× (better) | 62.4× |
| P/FCF | 9.3× (better) | 55.8× |
| FCF yield | 10.7% (better) | 1.8% |
| Fair value | – | $148.80 |
| Margin of safety | – | −116% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.7% | 32.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.4% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 365% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 362% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −18.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.5% | 44.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.18% | 12.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.3% | 10.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.0% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 22.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 20.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.06 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.81 |
| Interest coverage | −0.1× | 10.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 3.80 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.86 | 6.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.85% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.85% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 93.3% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$95.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.9% | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- ADTN stock overview
- ADTN income statement
- ADTN valuation and score
- CIEN stock overview
- CIEN income statement
- CIEN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.