Autodesk vs PTC
ADSK and PTC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADSK and PTC compare
Autodesk is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as PTC ($52.2B against $21.2B).
On earnings, PTC is cheaper: it trades at 19.0× trailing earnings, against 32.3× for Autodesk.
PTC grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.5% versus 17.9% for Autodesk).
PTC keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 41.4% compared with 21.1% at Autodesk.
PTC scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 18 for Autodesk), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADSK | PTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.2B | $21.2B |
| Share price | $249.61 | $195.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.0% | −1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −23.1% | 55.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 14K | 7,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 6 | 6 |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.3× | 19.0× (better) |
| P/S | 6.7× (better) | 7.2× |
| P/B | 15.4× | 6.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.7× | 17.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 18.4× (better) | 22.7× |
| PEG | 2.83 | 0.60 (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $320.62 | $321.76 |
| Margin of safety | 22.1% | 39.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% | 19.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.7% (better) | 13.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 57.4% | 139% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 59.8% | 142% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.78% | 40.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 91.2% (better) | 84.5% |
| Operating margin | 26.2% | 37.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 21.1% | 41.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 36.4% (better) | 31.7% |
| Return on equity | 53.9% (better) | 35.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 61.6% (better) | 27.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.88 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.52 | −0.27 |
| Interest coverage | – | 17.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.86 | 1.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.16 | 5.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | 6.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 6.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.0% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 0.35% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.2M (better) | −$11.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- ADSK stock overview
- ADSK income statement
- ADSK valuation and score
- PTC stock overview
- PTC income statement
- PTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- ADBE vs ADSK
- ADSK vs CDNS
- ADSK vs SNPS
- ADSK vs TTWO
- BSY vs PTC
- CDNS vs PTC
- DT vs PTC
- HUBS vs PTC
- PTC vs VEEV
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.