Automatic Data Processing vs PagSeguro Digital
ADP and PAGS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADP and PAGS compare
PagSeguro Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 6.5% for Automatic Data Processing).
Automatic Data Processing keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.3% compared with 10.4% at PagSeguro Digital.
Automatic Data Processing pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; PagSeguro Digital does not pay one.
Automatic Data Processing scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 4 for PagSeguro Digital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADP | PAGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $117B | – |
| Share price | $293.84 | $7.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.5% | −16.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.0% | −77.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 1.43 |
| Employees | 67K | 8,645 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.0× | – |
| P/S | 5.2× | – |
| P/B | 22.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.0× | – |
| PEG | 2.59 | – |
| Fair value | $287.82 | – |
| Margin of safety | −2.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | 24.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.4% (better) | 0.09% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.6% | – |
| Net margin | 20.3% (better) | 10.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 32.0% |
| Return on equity | 78.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.98 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.24 | 0.06 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.03 | 1.36 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.18 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 59.1% | 29.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 40.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.18% | 41.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$13.1M | $1.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | – |
Go deeper
- ADP stock overview
- ADP income statement
- ADP valuation and score
- PAGS stock overview
- PAGS income statement
- PAGS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.