Adient vs Visteon
ADNT and VC side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADNT and VC compare
Visteon is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Adient ($2.0B against $1.2B).
Adient grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus 1.9% for Visteon).
Visteon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −0.11% at Adient.
Visteon pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Adient does not pay one.
Visteon scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for Adient), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADNT | VC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $16.00 | $82.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.2% | −23.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −65.3% | −31.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.36 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 65K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.2× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.1× |
| P/FCF | 5.6× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.76 |
| FCF yield | 18.0% | – |
| Fair value | $42.74 | $112.07 |
| Margin of safety | 62.6% (better) | 26.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% (better) | 1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.3% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.11% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | – |
| Return on equity | −1.0% | 10.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.44 | 0.23 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.41 |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 1.61 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.68 | 3.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 8.1% | 14.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% | 15.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 129% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$666K (better) | −$11.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 16.8% |
Go deeper
- ADNT stock overview
- ADNT income statement
- ADNT valuation and score
- VC stock overview
- VC income statement
- VC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.