StockData

ADMA Biologics vs Kamada

ADMA and KMDA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ADMA and KMDA compare

Kamada grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.2% versus 6.3% for ADMA Biologics).

ADMA Biologics scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for Kamada), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricADMAKMDA
Size and price
Market cap$3.0B–
Share price$13.24$8.13
Change, 1 year−17.4%15.2%
Change, 5 years765%45.2%
Beta (5Y)0.640.76
Employees647393
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)5
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E17.2×–
P/S5.7×–
P/B6.8×–
EV/EBITDA12.2×–
P/FCF22.3×–
FCF yield4.5%–
Fair value$21.15–
Margin of safety37.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.3%13.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average64.6% (better)6.3%
Net income growth (TTM)−12.9%–
EPS growth (TTM)−9.4%–
EPS growth, 5Y average–−1.6%
Profitability
Gross margin68.5% (better)40.8%
Operating margin46.5% (better)14.5%
Net margin35.1%–
FCF margin25.6%–
Return on equity41.9%–
Return on invested capital39.4%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.45–
Net debt / EBITDA0.29 (better)−0.54
Interest coverage22.8×26.8× (better)
Current ratio6.04 (better)4.06
Altman Z-score8.58–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield6.4%–
Shareholder yield6.4%–
Ownership
Held by institutions91.8%8.6%
Held by insiders3.0%45.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.5M−$1.7M (better)
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float8.3%0.53%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.