Agree Realty vs Phillips Edison &
ADC and PECO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADC and PECO compare
Agree Realty is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Phillips Edison & ($8.3B against $5.0B).
On earnings, Phillips Edison & is cheaper: it trades at 35.0× trailing earnings, against 36.1× for Agree Realty.
Agree Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.2% versus 8.1% for Phillips Edison &).
Agree Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.8% compared with 19.1% at Phillips Edison &.
Both pay dividends: Agree Realty yields 4.7% and Phillips Edison & 3.4%.
Phillips Edison & scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Agree Realty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADC | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.3B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $67.07 | $38.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.2% | 14.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.4% | 15.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.42 |
| Employees | 90 | 320 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.1× | 35.0× (better) |
| P/S | 10.7× | 6.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.23 |
| Fair value | $59.27 | $43.05 |
| Margin of safety | −13.2% | 9.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.2% (better) | 8.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.6% (better) | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.0% | 109% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.7% | 109% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.34% | 77.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 47.9% | – |
| Net margin | 28.8% (better) | 19.1% |
| Return on equity | 3.7% | 6.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 (better) | 0.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 162% | 113% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 16.3% |
| Buyback yield | −11.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −7.1% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 89.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 0.67% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $9.9M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- ADC stock overview
- ADC income statement
- ADC valuation and score
- PECO stock overview
- PECO income statement
- PECO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.