StockData

Adagene vs Crescent Biopharma

ADAG and CBIO side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ADAG and CBIO compare

Adagene keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −230% compared with −728% at Crescent Biopharma.

Crescent Biopharma scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Adagene), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricADAGCBIO
Size and price
Market cap–$534M
Share price$2.00$14.37
Change, 1 year17.6%8.5%
Change, 5 years−79.5%−92.4%
Beta (5Y)0.751.63
Employees12844
StockData Score
Total score510 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score22
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–35.6×
P/B–1.9×
FCF yield–−15.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7333%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average61.4% (better)1.3%
Profitability
Operating margin−279% (better)−1217%
Net margin−230% (better)−728%
FCF margin−204% (better)−550%
Return on equity−27.7% (better)−55.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−46.3×–
Current ratio5.0212.57 (better)
Altman Z-score–10.62
Piotroski F-score4–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions32.5%79.7%
Held by insiders16.8%38.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$162K$29.1M (better)
Short interest, % of float–18.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.