Array Digital Infrastructure vs IHS
AD and IHS side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AD and IHS compare
Array Digital Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.1% versus 6.8% for IHS).
Array Digital Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 292% compared with 9.1% at IHS.
Array Digital Infrastructure pays a dividend yielding 76.3%; IHS does not pay one.
Array Digital Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 6 for IHS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AD | IHS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | – |
| Share price | $27.84 | $8.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.9% | 22.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.8% | −43.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 60 | 2,762 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.7× | – |
| P/S | 10.9× | – |
| P/B | 1.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× | – |
| PEG | 0.22 | – |
| FCF yield | −17.7% | – |
| Fair value | $95.30 | – |
| Margin of safety | 70.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 71.1% (better) | 6.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −47.4% | 2.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3961% (better) | 28.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4039% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −26.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.6% (better) | 55.8% |
| Operating margin | 257% (better) | 45.5% |
| Net margin | 292% (better) | 9.1% |
| FCF margin | −194% | 43.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 33.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 19.4% | 28.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.50 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.72 (better) | 2.88 |
| Interest coverage | 13.8× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.93 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 76.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 76.3% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.7% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | – | 6.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$261K (better) | −$2.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.87% |
Go deeper
- AD stock overview
- AD income statement
- AD valuation and score
- IHS stock overview
- IHS income statement
- IHS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.